| 
"LOCAL
COMMENT: Friend of the Court plan needs replacing Choices,
more efficiency are best for kids"
| For
media inquiries, please contact the NCCSO at (866) 244-1946
or email Mary Anne Best. |
Detroit
Free Press (Detroit, MI)
November 29, 2002
By Michael LaFaive
Michigan's
next attorney general, Mike Cox, says the reason he wants
to pursue "deadbeat" parents and get them to pay
their overdue child support is because he wants to help the
kids.
A great way to do that would be to
make it easier for custodial parents to fire Michigan's Friend
of the Court, the state's official child support collection
agency, and hire a private attorney or collection agency to
do the same job.
If you're a custodial parent whose
deadbeat ex-spouse owes child support, be careful: Once a
relationship with the Friend of the Court has been established,
custodial parents cannot choose to end it.
Indeed, it is easier to get a divorce
than to close a case with the FOC. Try to hire someone in
the private sector to collect, and you'll discover what many
parents already have: Michigan is among the few states that
make this option difficult, if not impossible.
A lawyer or collection agency can obtain
records or files only through the parent; the FOC refuses
officially to deal with anyone else.
This includes payment: Any delinquent
child support money collected -- to be recognized legally
-- must come to the FOC first, which pays the parent after
taking its cut.
In other words, having failed the custodial
parent, the FOC takes its pay anyway. It then leaves the parent
to pay the private collector -- which did the real work --
from his or her own cut.
Marcia McBrien, public information
officer for the Michigan Supreme Court, does not defend the
fairness of this practice but says the FOC's policy is based
on its "interpretation of state law."
Even if the FOC had a sterling record
with regard to collections, this arrangement would still reduce
parents' choices with regard to what is best for their children,
and create additional work for already burdened single parents.
And it presumes that government officials know what is best
for parents and children using the FOC. But the FOC is commonly
delinquent in collecting delinquent child support.
Washtenaw County resident Nancy Fox
is a case in point.
Her ex-husband left Michigan one year
after a 1990 court order mandated his level of child support,
and he stopped making payments. Twice a year for 10 years,
Fox traveled to Ann Arbor's FOC office and filled out its
many forms in the hope that officials would find her ex-husband,
collect what was owed her, and ensure that future support
payments would be forthcoming. Nothing worked until she turned
to Supportkids, a private, for-profit collection agency based
in Austin, Texas.
Fox signed an agreement with Supportkids,
promising the collector 34 percent of the money collected
under her contract. She figured that "getting most of
what I was owed was better than getting 100 percent of nothing."
It took Supportkids just two months
to obtain the decade of missing payments from her ex-husband.
The collection agency also made arrangements for his quarterly
payments to resume immediately.
The story does not end there.
As per official policy, when the same
FOC office that failed to collect for Nancy Fox for a decade
got wind of the private agency's success, it mandated that
Supportkids route the ex-husband's payment through the FOC,
at which time it would take its "processing fee."
So, having been bested by its private
rival, the FOC demanded a piece of the financial pie anyway.
Even worse, the agency took its cut
from a single mother who already had given up a third of what
was originally owed her.
According to a March 2002 report by
the U.S. General Accounting Office, state and local governments
elsewhere have been turning to private collection agencies
to help address growing caseloads. The report states that,
of the parents who hire private enforcement agencies, 64 percent
do so because state agencies fail to collect for them.
Another 28 percent cite frustration
with the "customer service" aspect of their government
collection agency. Nationwide, child support in arrears through
August 2001 amounted to $89 billion -- $5.5 billion of which
was owed to Michigan parents, mostly moms, and children.
Attorney General-elect Cox and Michigan's
Legislature should put their heads together and make it easier
for parents to divorce themselves from the FOC and seek superior
private alternatives.
A
government bureaucracy may lose a little turf, but it's what
would be best for Michigan's children.
Click
here to read Letters to the Editor in response to this commentary. |